Comments on: JBoss Tools Smooks Editor – Progress… http://blog.smooks.org/2010/01/15/jboss-tools-smooks-editor-progress/ The official blog Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:27:39 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Tom Fennelly http://blog.smooks.org/2010/01/15/jboss-tools-smooks-editor-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-92 Tom Fennelly Fri, 28 May 2010 11:38:15 +0000 http://blog.smooks.org/?p=366#comment-92 Hi Alexander. All fields must be declared in the EDI mapping model. The reason you are getting the error you are getting is because that 7th field is not defined, or not defined properly. Hi Alexander.

All fields must be declared in the EDI mapping model. The reason you are getting the error you are getting is because that 7th field is not defined, or not defined properly.

]]> By: Alexander Dik http://blog.smooks.org/2010/01/15/jboss-tools-smooks-editor-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-91 Alexander Dik Fri, 28 May 2010 11:28:44 +0000 http://blog.smooks.org/?p=366#comment-91 Hello Tom I have tried EDI to xml and it works fine as in example. But in the real EDI message it is quite possible to have some optionals fields. For instance in your basic EDI example there is header segement: "HDR*1*0*59.97*64.92*4.95*Wed Nov 15 13:45:28 EST 2006" It contains 6 fields. But if there would be 7 fields Smooks throws error: "EDI message processing failed [DVD Order][1.0]. Segment [HDR] expected to contain 6 fields. Actually contains 7 fields". Is there workaround to make Smooks aware of optional fields inside segment? Hello Tom

I have tried EDI to xml and it works fine as in example.

But in the real EDI message it is quite possible to have some optionals fields.

For instance in your basic EDI example there is header segement:
“HDR*1*0*59.97*64.92*4.95*Wed Nov 15 13:45:28 EST 2006″
It contains 6 fields. But if there would be 7 fields Smooks throws error:

“EDI message processing failed [DVD Order][1.0]. Segment [HDR] expected to contain 6 fields. Actually contains 7 fields”.

Is there workaround to make Smooks aware of optional fields inside segment?

]]> By: siddharth http://blog.smooks.org/2010/01/15/jboss-tools-smooks-editor-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-62 siddharth Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:13:36 +0000 http://blog.smooks.org/?p=366#comment-62 hi guys, I am confused,can any one tel me y do v use config-smooks and pom file. How can we create(pom) it using eclipse? hi guys,
I am confused,can any one tel me y do v use config-smooks and pom file.
How can we create(pom) it using eclipse?

]]> By: tom http://blog.smooks.org/2010/01/15/jboss-tools-smooks-editor-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-58 tom Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:25:34 +0000 http://blog.smooks.org/?p=366#comment-58 Hi Per. Q1: Yes... direct source to result mapping is something we are planning for the next release - see point #1 in the list of things not yet supported in JBT 3.1.0. Q2: Can you provide more details on this please... preferably in the form of a JIRA: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10020 Hi Per.

Q1: Yes… direct source to result mapping is something we are planning for the next release – see point #1 in the list of things not yet supported in JBT 3.1.0.

Q2: Can you provide more details on this please… preferably in the form of a JIRA: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10020

]]> By: Per http://blog.smooks.org/2010/01/15/jboss-tools-smooks-editor-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-57 Per Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:14:41 +0000 http://blog.smooks.org/?p=366#comment-57 Great tool! I have two questions: - It would be nice if you could map EDI straight to XSD(not using the middle step of Java model). Is this planed for? - I'm not able to apply XML template to my java model, only CVS. I'm using JBDS 3(early access) with Smooks UI tools version 1.1.0.v201001060655N-H50-CR1. Great tool! I have two questions:

- It would be nice if you could map EDI straight to XSD(not using the middle step of Java model). Is this planed for?
- I’m not able to apply XML template to my java model, only CVS. I’m using JBDS 3(early access) with Smooks UI tools version 1.1.0.v201001060655N-H50-CR1.

]]> By: tom http://blog.smooks.org/2010/01/15/jboss-tools-smooks-editor-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-49 tom Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:50:15 +0000 http://blog.smooks.org/?p=366#comment-49 @WorkingWithEDI: You're right and this is something I created a JIRA for: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5696 Please let us hear any other comments you have.. help us evolve this into something really useful :) @WorkingWithEDI: You’re right and this is something I created a JIRA for: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5696

Please let us hear any other comments you have.. help us evolve this into something really useful :)

]]> By: WorkingWithEDI http://blog.smooks.org/2010/01/15/jboss-tools-smooks-editor-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-48 WorkingWithEDI Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:18:29 +0000 http://blog.smooks.org/?p=366#comment-48 Well I guess the graphical mapping can get a bit hairy if your going to map real EDI-Standard Mappings ( which would extends over at least 2 screens? But for a free Tool that looks nice so far. Have to test it a bit more with some real word data. Well I guess the graphical mapping can get a bit hairy if your going to map real EDI-Standard Mappings ( which would extends over at least 2 screens?
But for a free Tool that looks nice so far. Have to test it a bit more with some real word data.

]]> By: Daniel Bevenius http://blog.smooks.org/2010/01/15/jboss-tools-smooks-editor-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-47 Daniel Bevenius Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:07:46 +0000 http://blog.smooks.org/?p=366#comment-47 This looks great Tom! You and the rest of the team have done really nice job here. Keep up the good work! /Daniel This looks great Tom! You and the rest of the team have done really nice job here. Keep up the good work!

/Daniel

]]>